Wednesday, October 24, 2012

When Government Makes Sense

Editors Notes: Kini Cosma of Equestrian Travel Mall and Legal Services says, "I have known Mr. Whitsett's previous wife for a number of years. Peggy is one of the best horse trainers in Klamath Falls, Oregon.

Senator Doug Whitsett says:

"No government should be allowed to pick business winners and losers. It is not government’s role to favor one business over another by skewing the playing field through the selective application of tax deductions, tax credits, guaranteed loans or accelerated depreciation. Neither is it government’s role to influence the development of business and industry through the application of punishing regulatory burdens, punitive fees or retaliatory fines.

Moreover, it is not governments’ role to encourage consumers to pick the products of one manufacturer over the products of another. And it is certainly not the role of government to dictate what product, or how much of a product, its citizens should purchase and use.
Governments’ only regulatory role in a capitalist free market economy should be limited to insuring that competition is fair. No more-no less.

I believe in the American Constitution! The Constitution is really an agreement, or covenant, between our government and our citizens. It is a covenant wherein the people grant limited authority to their government to control their lives. That authority is limited to preserving civilization, supplying services necessary for the common good, providing for the national defense and maintaining a fair and equitable system of justice.

The founders worked long and hard to craft a document that would insure that the United States government would never exceed the authorities granted to it by the people. Their system of checks and balances was carefully designed to maintain the ultimate power to the people that consent to be governed

 The first ten amendments specifically spell out certain rights and privileges that are retained by the people. But those are not the only rights that are preserved. The Constitution clearly states that government authority is limited to only those powers specifically conferred to it by the people. All other rights and privileges are retained by the states and by their citizens.

Every legislator is required to swear, by oath or affirmation, to defend and uphold that Constitution. I believe that the primary obligation of every legislator is to determine whether the constitution confers the authority to enact a law, administrative rule, or regulation. It is our first duty to vigorously oppose any law, rule or regulation where that specific constitutional authority cannot be cited.

Unfortunately, the last few generations of Americans have not done a very good job of controlling government growth and power. We have allowed ourselves to become complacent during several decades of relative prosperity. We have failed to teach our children either how our government works or the critical importance of those Constitutional limits.

Meanwhile, our governments have succeeded in incrementally eroding away our Constitutional guaranteed rights, privileges, and freedoms.

Government has intruded into virtually every facet of our once proud and productive free market economy. That intrusion is regulating several of our natural resource industries virtually out of existence. Many of our manufacturers have been forced to move their businesses over-seas as the direct result of labor, consumer and environmental regulations.

We have allowed our constitutionally protected property rights to be redefined. Governments, now limit what we can and cannot do on our own property. Even more onerous, our government now tells us what we must do on our own land.

We have allowed our right to freedom of speech to deteriorate to generally include language that our political elite consider to be correct and acceptable. Free expression has been displaced with the concept of creating social justice and our political elite are determined to define what is just.

Our Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. Separation of church and state is imperative to a free people. That is undeniably demonstrated by the chaos and persecution rampant in many of the Muslim controlled countries today.

Governments must not be allowed to impose their selected religious beliefs on their citizens. But that does not mean that free people should not be permitted to express their religious beliefs whenever and wherever they choose.

Finally, the right to own and bear arms is the bedrock of the foundation of a free society. That right is under siege in the United States. Our citizens’ response to that dire threat is encouraging. The current rate of purchase of firearms and ammunition is unprecedented.

Freedom has never endured in any nation where its citizens have given up the right to own firearms. If we the people fail to draw a line in the sand on this critical issue we surely will lose the ability to protect any of our other constitutionally guaranteed rights and privileges.
Like most Americans, I believe in and love this great nation.
Options
I believe that this election is the most critical in the history of our state and nation. It is past time for we the people to stand up and take back control of our governments. It is past time that we the people demand that governments be once again constrained by their constitutional limits of authority.

Our governments have always been directed by the vote of their people. This time, apathy and indecision are not an option. The future of our state and nation, as we know them, are at stake."




Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Congressman Greg Walden's Opinion For Violence Against Women


Dear Kini:

Thank you contacting me about the Violence Against Women Act (H.R.4970). I appreciate you taking the time to share your views. 


The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) was originally passed in 1994. Since then VAWA has greatly succeeded in changing attitudes toward and fostering awareness of domestic violence, improving services and provisions for victims, and revising the manner in which the criminal justice system responds to domestic violence. The program has been reauthorized twice since its original passage, and both times I have joined the very strong bipartisan group of Republicans and Democrats voting in support of the program. 


The VAWA program has always been about protecting all women, irrespective of race or creed, from violence. Rep. Sandy Adams, who introduced the House's most recent version, the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2012, was herself a victim of abuse who fought her way through the system and used this experience to help develop this legislation. 


Like each previous VAWA reauthorization, this bill would build upon what we've learned over the years and expand its scope. First, it would ensure the current program continues to protect victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and stalking. Additionally, the House bill would double funding to help with the current backlog of processing rape kits, increase access of emergency and transitional housing for victims, create tribal liaisons within the U.S. Attorney's to address current inadequacies in protecting Indian victims within the U.S. Court system, and allow Indian victims of violence to seek protection orders against Indian or non-Indian abusers.


On May 16, I voted for this legislation, and we have asked the Senate to join us in a formal conference committee in order to work through the differences between the House and Senate versions. I will continue to urge my colleagues to move forward with this process, so we can pass a final version and ensure the program continues to protect all women from violence and abuse. 


Thank you again for writing me about this issue. It's an honor to represent you in the U.S. Congress.

Best regards,


Greg Walden

Member of Congress

Friday, October 19, 2012

FRY YOU ROTTEN COVERED UP PSYCHOPATHS


FOR A MONTH THE LIVING FAITH FELLOWSHIP, INC. AT 4549 HOMEDALE, KLAMATH FALLS, OREGON HAD LOCKED ME OUT OF MY ACCESS AREA. I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO CARE FOR MY THREE HORSES. I HADN'T BEEN ABLE TO CHECK UP ON MY HORSES DUE TO THE  HARASSMENT, INTIMIDATION, AND BULLYING. AFTER CONTACTING ANIMAL RIGHTS ACTIVISTS AND AGENCIES, ON OCTOBER 17,  I ATTEMPTED TO CHECK ON THEM TO SEE IF THEY AT LEAST HAD WATER. LOOKING AROUND THE AREA, IT APPEARED TO BE NO ONE.

WHILE FILLING THEIR TROUGH, I WHISTLED TO THEM AND THEY CAME RUNNING EXCITED TO SEE ME, KICKING, BUCKING EACH OTHER FOR ATTENTION, FROLICKING, JUST LIKE LITTLE COLTS IN A MEADOW. I WAS IN A HEAVENLY BLISS WATCHING THEM PLAY.  A MEMBER OF THE CHURCH ROUNDED THE BUILDING CORNER AND SPOOKED THEM AWAY. SON OF A BITCH VERBALLY HARASSED ME WITH SOME INCOHERENT WORDS TELLING ME TO VACATE THE PREMISES. 

TODAY, OCTOBER 18, THE ROTTEN FUCK'N CHURCH MEMBERS 
(http://judiciary.zoomshare.com/files/ACTUAL_COMPLAINT.pdf) WERE WAITING FOR ME AFTER MY NEEDED WALK. ABOUT TEN OF THESE HUGE MONSTERS FROM HELL MOB LYNCHED ME BY SERVING ME A FAULTY EVICTION NOTICE BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO PLAY THEIR BULLY GAMES WITH THE NAPA POLICE DEPT, THE KLAMATH COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT, AND THE FEDERAL COURTS AT THE EXPENSE OF MY HEALTH.. MEANWHILE, THESE FUCK'N HYPOCRITS LOCKED ME OUT FOR A MONTH WHICH CAUSED ME TO FILE ANOTHER CASE IN FEDERAL COURT. NO MATTER HOW RIGHT OR WRONG I AM, THE COURT AGAIN DISMISSED MY CASE. 


Specification of Prohibited Conduct

The definition of bullying includes a non-exclusive list of specific behaviors that constitute bullying, and specifies that bullying includes intentional efforts to harm one or more individuals, may be direct or indirect, is not limited to behaviors that cause physical harm, and may be verbal (including oral and written language) or non-verbal. 

While the definition of bullying can be easily understood and interpreted by school boards, policymakers, school administrators, school staff, students, students’ families, and the community, it is incoherently understood by state and federal courts. http://judiciary.zoomshare.com/files/ACTUAL_COMPLAINT.pdf


Thursday, October 4, 2012

THE ANIMAL ACTIVISTS HAVE ASKED ME TO CALL THE POLICE!


My girlfriend is a cop in Napa and she is a bully.


she looks like a he....that's ok...so are you all alone

Can't you imagine her fat ass crying in a tiny, whiney, little girl voice, to her police buddies "oooooo. She took my dog! Are you guys going to let her get away with that? Aren't you going to save me?" 


I really don't know why you are so dangerous or why you went to a mental hospital..what was your diagnosis


DO YOU HAVE AN ANGER MANAGEMENT PROBLEM..????? I don't see why everyone hates you..for what??? bad attitude?

cuz I don't wanna fuck their American men



They don't like me cuz I sued the _ _ _ _ out of them and they know I'm right. Then, I ping it all over the world for other officials to see what they do to women.
The Animal Activists Ask And Tell Me To Call The Police

Have you ever heard anything so ridiculous?


http://judiciary.zoomshare.com/files/ACTUAL_COMPLAINT.pdf
http://judiciary.zoomshare.com/files/MARGRET-BILL.pdf
http://judiciary.zoomshare.com/files/AFFIDAVIT.pdf
http://judiciary.zoomshare.com/files/HorseSvcCompanion.pdf



I asked her if anything happened to her in the line of duty if I could have her teeth.


But, then I realized she had them wolf fangs going on.




She said NO but I could have her fat ass

she is a big girl...


Yep. Big and F A T


That's what happens when you become a bully, you become self-loathing then you eat and eat and eat to cover up the hatred.


what can I say...how about changing the subject


I wish you better days ....you certainly are tough and a fighter


It's the kinda thing you can say about your mother but if anyone else says it, they are in trouble. Know what i mean


My family (The family) is really wealthy from selling nonferrous metals. They live in Black Hawk (Danville), Piedmont in Oakland. They have everything they've ever wanted including my $100g